In 2016 J. D. Vance’s book, Hillbilly Elegy: A Memoir of a Family and Culture in Crisis was published to critical acclaim. Of the book, the Economist said, "You will not read a more important book about America this year." It the story of one family of the Appalachian diaspora that moved out eastern Kentucky and poverty after WW II, fell back into it in the 70’s and 80’s and how the author escaped but left behind the poverty that still haunts the Midwest.
This entry is not about Hillbilly Elegy. It is about a book that, in an organized and systematic way, explains every facet of the origins of poverty that J.D. Vance experienced, the patterns of culture and family structure that he experienced in poverty, and offers instruction in how to break those patterns and where Vance’s escape from poverty is a prime example.
The book is A Framework for Understanding Poverty by Ruby K. Payne.[1] Ms. Payne is a educator and she wrote this book as a workbook for teachers and guidance counselors to help them not merely deal with poor students but help them develop skill sets to get them out of poverty. More than 20% of children in this country live in poverty.[2] This is not only a disproportionate part of our population but we are 34th out of 35 developed countries[3] with respect to the percent of children in poverty.
A patient of mine who is a retired police officer and runs a shelter for homeless women and children told me about the book and for me I did “not read a more important book about America” in 2016 and I read it on the heels of reading Hillbilly Elegy.
In the introduction she has “Key points about Poverty” and some statistics, about poverty. Most important in this are the factor that get people out of poverty. These are that it is too painful to stay, a vision or a goal, a special talent or skill, a key relationship.
In chapter one she enumerates the factors that define poverty. Poverty is more than a lack of money. People who are poor also lack:
1. Emotional resources, the ability to withstand hardship and persevere. She considers this the most important resource
2. Mental resources, ability to process information
3. Spiritual resources when present help the individual to not feel hopeless or useless.
4. Physical resources, People with disabilities lack the ability to be self-sufficient
5. Support systems, people or groups who provide physical, financial, or emotional support for the person in poverty
6. Role model/mentor to model the hidden rules of the class (the middle class) to which you should be aspiring if you want to get out of poverty.
7. Knowledge of the hidden rules of class
In chapter 3 she enumerates the hidden rules of poverty, middle class and the wealthy. People in these different classes have different relationships to very fundamental aspects of our life. The following are some examples:
|
POVERTY |
MIDDLE CLASS |
WEALTHY |
Money |
To be used and spent |
To be managed |
To be conserved and invested |
Education |
Valued and revered as abstract but not as reality |
Crucial for climbing success ladder and making money |
Necessary tradition for making and maintaining connections |
Time |
Present most important. Decision made for moment on feelings and survival |
Future most important. Decisions made for future ramifications |
Traditions and history most important. Decisions made partially on basis of tradition and decorum |
Nice post, Geoff. I've read reviews of the Payne book. It resonates with me and so many other things I've been reading about culture, education, and cognition.
ReplyDeleteI think we need to be careful however when we list resources that poor people "lack." First of all, we should be clear that although patterns such as these tend to be true, there are also certainly differences between individuals in each of these groups. Although this may be an unintended consequence of the model, stereotyping is a problem that continues to inhibit mobility in either direction; studies like these can make the situation even worse. But even more importantly, most if not all of these tendencies should not be understood as the simple "lack" of resources but rather as the allocation of precious resources to solve the unique challenges of existence as a member of that class. After all, "The poor... are making the choices they make because that is what allows them to survive in poverty." Do you suppose members of the most affluent classes are likely to possess the emotional, mental, social, spiritual resources to survive in our poorest communities? I don't think so. Perhaps it is the nature of these resources rather than their presence or absence.
Hi Steve,
DeleteI appreciate your comment. I feel I haven’t done Ms. Payne justice in reviewing her book. Let me try to clarify. I don’t think she is stereotyping at all. She is saying unique to each individual person in poverty in addition to lacking money some one or combination of these other resources are lacking that adds to the burden of poverty and make it harder to escape. Most of the first chapter is made up of case studies asking the reader (it is a work book) to identify the resources that the person is lacking that exacerbates their poverty. I don’t think this is stereotyping; I think it is identifying antecedents that lead to or exacerbate poverty in the same way identifying poor diet and lack of exercise as antecedent to diabetes.
In chapter 4 (and elsewhere) Ms. Payne makes the point that people in poverty aren’t less intelligent than any other class. She would readily agree that people in the affluent class at least initially if they were thrown into poverty would not do well principally because they are ignorant of the hidden rules of that class. She would readily agree that people in poverty adhere to those hidden rules because that is what works to survive in poverty. They allocate their resources differently. However, that allocation doesn’t work when one is trying to get out of poverty. The trick is to get people to understand the hidden rules of the middle class and apply them where appropriate. (You may need to carry a gun on the street but it is not appropriate or tolerated in school.)
I encourage you to take a look at the book. Ms. Payne makes her case much more convincingly than I can.
Again thanks for your comment.